Amazon Performance Plus: Setup, Strategy, and ROAS Gains
Amazon Performance+ is reshaping how brands use Amazon DSP, but you don’t need to unpack every technical detail to decide if it belongs in your plan. The points below summarize what it is, how to think about its role in your funnel, and the conditions you need in place before you turn it on.
Amazon DSP has evolved from a niche add-on for Amazon sellers into a full-funnel, omni-channel engine that can move the needle for both endemic and non-endemic brands. At the center of that evolution is Performance+, an AI-driven campaign type that uses Amazon’s shopping and streaming signals plus your own conversion data to find the audiences most likely to buy.
Amazon’s marketing will tell you Performance+ is “simpler and smarter.” For most brands, what matters more is how it changes your day-to-day planning, what you can stop doing manually, and where you still need to stay hands-on if you care about outcomes.
That’s the theory. In practice, Performance+ only pays off when you launch it with the right goals, inputs, and guardrails, then measure its impact beyond last-click ROAS. In this guide, we’ll walk through what Performance+ actually is, how it works under the hood, how to run a fit check before you turn it on, and the launch, optimization, and measurement plays our team uses to turn AI automation into durable business outcomes.
Performance+ is a predictive campaign type within Amazon DSP, not a new ad unit. It uses Amazon’s first-party signals and machine learning to dynamically build audiences and optimize bids toward a performance KPI, typically ROAS for retail-focused campaigns or CPA for lead and subscription goals.
That makes it fundamentally different from Sponsored Products, Sponsored Brands, and Sponsored Display, which are keyword- and product-level CPC formats built to capture explicit intent on Amazon search and product detail pages. Performance+ runs wherever your audience spends time, including display placements, online video, and streaming TV inventory across Amazon-owned properties and third-party publishers connected through Amazon’s supply integrations. Instead of asking you to hand-pick dozens of static audiences and line items, it uses predictive modeling to decide which impressions are most likely to convert within the guardrails you set.
For brands that have already exhausted the obvious Sponsored Ads tactics and non-branded keyword expansions, Performance+ becomes the bridge between that high-intent aisle and a broader pool of prospects and customers across the open internet, connected TV (CTV), and premium streaming content.
Most marketers have been burned by “black box” automation that hides what the algorithm is doing or strips away too much control. Performance+ was built around the opposite concept: a “glass box” approach where Amazon’s AI handles the heavy lifting, but you still see and steer the strategy.
On the automation side, Performance+ takes audience modeling, line-item scaffolding, and bid optimization off your plate. Instead of spinning up separate line items for every combination of audience, inventory, and device, you declare your KPI, budget, and guardrails, and the model continuously scores users and impressions on their likelihood to drive that outcome. Over time, predictive bidding replaces the weeks of manual “test every targeting mix” work that Skai and Amazon’s teams identified as a major pain point in our joint webinar below.
Crucially, that doesn’t mean ceding control. Advertisers and agencies still decide:
Amazon provides granular reporting at the domain, app, placement type, and creative size levels, so buyers can see exactly where dollars went and adjust those levers as new insights emerge. That makes Performance+ a fit for marketers who want AI to work harder for them without giving up the supply transparency and governance their finance and brand teams expect.
Want to hear how this “glass box” feels in real life? In our Amazon & Retail Media Summit session below, leaders from Tinuiti, Amazon Ads, and Skai unpack how Performance+ automation changes their day-to-day work—what they’ve handed to the model and where they still insist on staying hands-on.
Under the hood, every Performance+ campaign revolves around a clearly defined performance goal. For endemic brands, that often means a ROAS target tied to on-Amazon sales; for non-endemic brands, it might be a CPA target for off-site leads, signups, or app events. In both cases, Amazon’s models ingest your conversion events and learn which combinations of audience signals, supply, and creatives drive that outcome most efficiently.
Where Performance+ sits in your broader plan depends on how you set those goals. With a ROAS or lower-funnel CPA target, it behaves like a mid-to-lower-funnel engine, turning upper-funnel awareness from Brand+, live sports, and other premium inventory into measurable conversions. With more flexible efficiency targets and a bigger budget, it can also play higher in the funnel, modeling new-to-brand audiences that your Sponsored Ads and retail media programs can later harvest.
The throughline: Performance+ is at its best when it’s not siloed as a “DSP test,” but woven into a full-funnel architecture that spans Brand+, Sponsored Ads, and Amazon Marketing Cloud (AMC).
Amazon brings a uniquely rich set of first-party signals to Performance+: shopping behavior, browsing and purchase history, streaming and Prime Video consumption, and other entertainment context data across its ecosystem. Performance+ taps these signals to understand who is in-market, who’s an existing customer, and who looks like your best buyers, even if they haven’t seen your brand yet.
On your side, the inputs are conversion events: purchases, leads, signups, app events, and other outcomes you accurately define and instrument. When those events are clean and consistent, the model can connect the dots between upstream impressions and downstream results, constantly re-weighting which combinations of signals and supply are most likely to produce the next conversion. That dynamic approach is why Performance+ tends to outperform static audience targeting that relies on one-time segment definitions and quarterly refreshes.
Instead of targeting “all users in audience X,” Performance+ scores each impression on its likelihood to drive your chosen conversion goal at an efficient cost. The model updates frequently as new performance data comes in, shifting spend toward combinations of audience, inventory, and creative that demonstrate they can meet your ROAS or CPA targets.
From a practitioner’s perspective, the learning phase feels like a structured exploration period. In the first days and weeks, you’ll see the model test different pockets of supply and audience clusters as it builds confidence about where to lean. Results typically stabilize once the campaign has sufficient conversions and budget throughput to identify patterns. That’s why we recommend making goal and structure changes in 15–20% increments on a weekly cadence, rather than swinging targets dramatically and resetting the model’s progress.
The net effect on day-to-day management is a shift in focus. Instead of micromanaging line-item bids and audiences, your time goes into setting smart guardrails, reading signal patterns, and using insights to refine creative, landing experiences, and budget allocation.
Performance+ supports three core tactics that roughly map to major stages of the customer lifecycle.
A mature Performance+ program typically runs all three tactics in concert, with budgets and guardrails tuned to your category dynamics and business goals. Acquisition drives new-to-brand growth, remarketing protects your investment in upper-funnel media, and retention protects and expands customer value over time.
There are four non-negotiables we look at before recommending Performance+:
A simple readiness scorecard consisting of Criterion, What “Good” Looks Like, Risk if Missing, and How to Fix Fast helps teams align on whether to launch now, fix prerequisites, or stay with more traditional DSP structures for the moment.
We see Performance+ over-deliver for brands that check a few boxes:
If your organization is already running Sponsored Ads at scale, has a baseline DSP program, and is investing in AMC, Performance+ is a natural next step rather than a leap into the unknown.
There are also scenarios where we recommend pressing pause:
In those cases, it’s usually better to shore up signals, creative, and governance first before layering in Performance+.
Once you’ve passed the fit check, launch discipline is what separates stable performance from “we tried it once and it didn’t work.”
Before you activate a single tactic, work through a tight pre-launch QA:
Codifying these steps in a runbook pays for itself in fewer false starts and cleaner tests.
The next decision is structural: do you bundle acquisition, remarketing, and retention into a single campaign or separate them?
Either way, we recommend:
That balance preserves the benefits of automation while keeping your media strategy intentional.
Even well-set-up Performance+ campaigns can hit plateaus. The key is to read symptoms correctly, diagnose likely causes, and pull the right levers without resetting the model every week.
Once Performance+ is live, the real work is interpreting what the platform is telling you. Instead of reacting to every fluctuation, we translate campaign behavior into a simple diagnostic framework: Symptom → Likely Cause → Lever.
The table below outlines some of the most common patterns we see in Performance+ campaigns and the first levers we recommend testing when they show up in your reports.
| Symptom | Likely cause | Lever to pull first |
| Spend will not scale | ROAS/CPA target is too aggressive, frequency caps are too tight, or inventory settings are overly narrow. | Loosen goals by 15–20%, widen eligible supply, and ease frequency caps to give the model room to explore. |
| CPA spikes or ROAS flatlines | Creative fatigue, landing-page friction, or noisy/duplicate conversion events. | Refresh creatives, QA site speed and UX, and audit conversion tagging for duplicates or misfires. |
| Remarketing saturates | Over-indexed on lower-funnel tactics with too few net-new users entering the funnel. | Shift budget toward acquisition tactics and upper-funnel supply to feed more new-to-brand prospects. |
| Streaming TV spends without visible site conversions | Misaligned expectations; CTV impact is showing up as incremental lift and assisted conversions, not last-click sales. | Use AMC path-to-purchase, assisted conversion, and LTV analyses; add holdout or geo-lift tests where possible. |
When performance drifts, the impulse is to slash or double targets overnight. That instinct is exactly what keeps Performance+ stuck in a permanent learning loop.
Instead, we recommend:
That discipline usually produces better long-term ROAS than reactive “panic editing.”
Four issues come up again and again in underperforming Performance+ programs:
Fixing these issues often yields more improvement than any tweak to bids or budgets.
Not every metric belongs in every meeting. We split Performance+ reporting into:
That cadence keeps the team focused on structural improvements rather than chasing every short-term fluctuation.
In the webinar, both Amazon and Tinuiti describe AMC as the backbone of decisioning for DSP strategies, including Performance+. AMC unlocks:
At Tinuiti, we use AMC and clean-room integrations as the core of a measurement governance cadence: weekly insight reviews feeding monthly strategy changes, with shared views across ecommerce, media, and finance stakeholders. That structure gives leaders confidence to keep investing when the data shows Performance+ is driving incremental growth.
Performance+ will show one set of numbers in the Amazon DSP UI; your business will care about a broader set of economics.
Because DSP’s influence is often upstream and multi-touch, last-click platform ROAS alone tends to undervalue it. Layering in holdout groups, geo-based tests, and AMC analyses gives you a more accurate sense of how much Performance+ is contributing, so you can scale with conviction.
Brand+ and Performance+ share the same AI foundation inside Amazon DSP but optimize for different KPIs. Brand+ is built for upper- and mid-funnel outcomes such as reach, awareness, and engagement; Performance+ is tuned for conversions and revenue.
Together, they allow you to:
Both products use the same glass-box transparency and control model, so you maintain a consistent approach to supply, brand safety, and measurement across the funnel.
DSP and Sponsored Display Ads are complementary, not competitive. A healthy architecture typically looks like this:
Insights should flow both ways. Creative and messaging that prove out in Performance+ video can inform Sponsored Brands assets; high-performing search terms and audience signals from Sponsored campaigns can become inputs for contextual and audience strategies in DSP. Budget planning then becomes a question of protecting bottom-funnel efficiency while ensuring you fund enough upper- and mid-funnel activity to keep the demand pipeline healthy.
In the webinar, our panelists didn’t mince words: treating DSP as a pure retargeting channel is overhyped and under-ambitious. Retargeting is a fine starting point, but when it becomes the center of your media strategy, you cap long-term growth.
Performance+ shines when you:
That mindset shift is often the difference between DSP as a cost center and DSP as a growth engine.
A few Performance+ strategies come up repeatedly in our work and in the panel conversation as underutilized:
These plays require a bit more upfront strategy and creative planning, but the payoff in incremental ROAS and new-to-brand growth is often significant.
Performance+ gives you a glass-box view into what Amazon’s AI is doing on your behalf, but that transparency only creates value if someone is actually reading the signals and pulling the levers.
Tinuiti was among the early beta-testing partners for Performance+, and we’ve since scaled it across categories with a full-funnel lens that spans DSP, Sponsored Ads, and AMC. That vantage point lets us pressure-test readiness before launch, establish governance and measurement frameworks that CFOs can trust, and architect media plans in which Brand+, Performance+, and Sponsored Ads work together rather than compete for budget.
If you’re evaluating Performance+ for your next growth phase or looking to move beyond a one-off test, the next step is a tailored fit check on your signals, creative, budget, and measurement so you know exactly what Performance+ can unlock for your business.
Copywriter, Tinuiti
Jenn Wheatley is a senior content strategist and copywriter who turns complex marketing data into clear, actionable stories. She develops research-backed reports and thought leadership that help brands navigate critical business decisions. Based in Utah, she enjoys cooking, strength training, and traveling with her family.